Contact Us / Visit Us (click here)
If the Shopping Cart takes too long to respond, you can bypass the shopping cart and go straight to the checkout page by clicking the following link: Checkout.
International Customers Click Here [Updated 1/2024]
Loading Trivia . . .
Hose - Fuel Filler Neck to Fuel Tank - ECONOMY - Repro ~ 1967 - 1970 Mercury Cougar / 1967 - 1970 Ford Mustang 1967,1967 cougar,1967 mustang,1968,1968 cougar,1968 mustang,1969,1969 cougar,1969 mustang,1970,1970 cougar,1970 mustang,c7w,c7z,c8w,c8z,c9w,c9z,cougar,d0w,d0z,filler,ford,ford mustang,fuel,gas,hose,mercury,mercury cougar,mustang,neck,new,pipe,repro,reproduction,tank,tube,rubber,hose,26659

Hose - Fuel Filler Neck to Fuel Tank - ECONOMY - Repro ~ 1967 - 1970 Mercury Cougar / 1967 - 1970 Ford Mustang
Item #: 26659

4.88 stars, based on 15 reviews
This Gas Tank To Filler Pipe Hose reproduction fits the 67, 68, 69, and 70 Mercury Cougar. Excludes 1970 with California emissions. Even if yours is not cracked it will be hard if it is over two decades old. We highly suggest you replace this part...
Display Options:
< Prev Next >
Reviews 1-10 of 15
SA, TX
2013

Material:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Fit:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Craftsmanship:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Correctness:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Pros:
Cons:
After having to cut my old filler neck hose off after 40+ years of service this thing slid right on and fit like a glove.

2013

Material:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Fit:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Craftsmanship:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Correctness:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Pros:
  • slips%20on%20no%20problem.
Cons:
Slips right on and fits good. Seems to be a little longer than the original. Would recommend comparing to original and cutting to same length, makes getting the filler neck in easier.

Material:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Fit:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Craftsmanship:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Correctness:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Pros:
Cons:
Perfect fit.

Tucson, AZ
2015

Material:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Fit:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Craftsmanship:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Correctness:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Pros:
Cons:
Great repro part. The only difference from (original?) on '68 Standard is the length. Old hose was nominally 3-1/4" long; repro is 4-7/8". Extra length deformed as it extended onto curve of filler tube. I could have cut it to shorter length but wanted to retain factory square-cut ends, so installed repro as received, clamping at tank and about 2/3's up in order to stay on straight section of filler tube. Works fine.

Material:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Fit:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Craftsmanship:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Correctness:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Pros:
Cons:
Perfect fit nice quality

Material:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Fit:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Craftsmanship:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Correctness:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Pros:
Cons:
Product was a great replacement when I was having to replace my fuel tank. Would recommend

67 fuel filler hose

Material:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Fit:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Craftsmanship:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Correctness:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Pros:
  • Price
  • fit
  • availability.
Cons:
  • Thin wall.
Easy install. Hose is just a little longer than it needs to be but maybe other cars have some variation. That's not a problem. It doesn't seem to be any heavier wall. Perhaps it is to reflect original equipment. The item description doest say but I'm hoping it is formulated for today's ethynol fuel mixes. It was very inexpensive. I received it quickly. Went on perfectly. Made me happy and the car doesn't smell like gas anymore. That makes the wife happy.

Australia
2015

From down under

Material:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Fit:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Craftsmanship:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Correctness:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Pros:
Cons:
Fits perfectly and that fuel smell has gone from the boot...or trunk as you guys call it.

Fuel Filler Neck

Material:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Fit:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Craftsmanship:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Correctness:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Pros:
Cons:
Correct fitment.

Kirkland, WA
2015

Fuel Filler Neck Hose

Material:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Fit:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Craftsmanship:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Correctness:
review-star review-star review-star review-star review-star
Pros:
  • Direct%20replacement
Cons:
Good quality, just like original.

< Prev Next >
Reviews 1-10 of 15